Thursday, July 10, 2008

FAQ - Finding a Premature Ejaculation Cure That Actually Works and ...


If you need a premature ejaculation cure that actually works, listen up. I've tried all the desensitizing creams, climax control condoms, thinking about baseball, you name it. None of it worked and I had gotten to the point where sex was something I dreaded, because I knew I would see that look of frustration and resentment on my partner's face when I failed to leave her satisfied.

I needed something that actually worked for stopping early ejaculation, and I found it with all-natural methods. I didn't have to worry about swallowing some pill or applying some cream, I just primed my body from the inside out for ending premature ejaculation by using natural techniques.

Here are the answers to the questions I hear most often about stopping premature ejaculation:

Is it enough to think about baseball or something else non-sexual during intercourse?

This is the first method most people try, including myself. Not only is it ineffective, but it takes you completely out of the moment and out of sync with your partner. It actually makes sex worse. Do you really want to be thinking about baseball when you should be thinking about pleasing your partner and yourself?

How long do I need to be able to last to make sure she is satisfied?

It takes the average woman twenty minutes to achieve orgasm during intercourse. If you are a "two minute man," rest assured you are never leaving her fully satisfied. Using a natural premature ejaculation cure, you should easily be able to last as long as she needs you to.

Why are natural methods better than pills or creams?

Even if pills or creams worked, which they don't, they would just be "quick fixes" that you would have to rely on for the rest of your life to stop premature ejaculation. By using natural methods you are re-training your body to withstand stimulation for longer periods of time, so all the results you gain are permanent.

You can buy Premature Ejaculation Cure here

.
Praestat's weblog

No comments: